<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 663 - COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE (APPEALS), CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220560</link>
    <description>The appellant, SCG Ex d Tech Pvt. Ltd., filed a refund claim after erroneously remitting duty to the wrong unit&#039;s account. Despite the initial rejection of the claim, the Commissioner recognized the error and granted the refund under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal allowed, overturning the Order-in-Original and confirming the appellant&#039;s entitlement to the refund of the excess duty paid, along with interest.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 01:12:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193923" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 663 - COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE (APPEALS), CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220560</link>
      <description>The appellant, SCG Ex d Tech Pvt. Ltd., filed a refund claim after erroneously remitting duty to the wrong unit&#039;s account. Despite the initial rejection of the claim, the Commissioner recognized the error and granted the refund under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal allowed, overturning the Order-in-Original and confirming the appellant&#039;s entitlement to the refund of the excess duty paid, along with interest.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220560</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>