<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 659 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220555</link>
    <description>Non-compliance with a stay order and absence of any compliance report or representation led to dismissal of the appeal. The CESTAT noted that, when the matter was called for verification of compliance, nothing had been placed on record to show that the stay directions had been obeyed. The appeal was therefore dismissed for failure to comply with the stay order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 08:23:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193918" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 659 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220555</link>
      <description>Non-compliance with a stay order and absence of any compliance report or representation led to dismissal of the appeal. The CESTAT noted that, when the matter was called for verification of compliance, nothing had been placed on record to show that the stay directions had been obeyed. The appeal was therefore dismissed for failure to comply with the stay order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220555</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>