<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 646 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220542</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for depreciation on intangible assets, directing the AO to permit depreciation on the purchase of clientele business. The alternative plea for revenue expenditure was dismissed. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision on non-deduction of TDS and the inapplicability of section 2(22)(e) regarding deemed dividend, resulting in the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2021 18:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193906" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 646 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220542</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for depreciation on intangible assets, directing the AO to permit depreciation on the purchase of clientele business. The alternative plea for revenue expenditure was dismissed. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision on non-deduction of TDS and the inapplicability of section 2(22)(e) regarding deemed dividend, resulting in the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220542</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>