https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220539 Interest on delayed duty payment under customs law remained payable, and the Settlement Commission's discretion to grant only partial immunity from interest was not open to interference under Article 226 absent legal error or arbitrariness. The court held that a settlement order cannot be selectively challenged by accepting the favourable parts while assailing only the interest component. In the absence of any infirmity in the exercise of discretion, the writ challenge to the interest levy was rejected. en-us Wed, 09 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 07 Feb 2014 17:13:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220539 Interest on delayed duty payment under customs law remained payable, and the Settlement Commission's discretion to grant only partial immunity from interest was not open to interference under Article 226 absent legal error or arbitrariness. The court held that a settlement order cannot be selectively challenged by accepting the favourable parts while assailing only the interest component. In the absence of any infirmity in the exercise of discretion, the writ challenge to the interest levy was rejected. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 09 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220539