<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 639 - CESTAT,  NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220535</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the manufacturing unit in a case involving the confiscation of goods and penalties for non-entry in the RG-I register. While the goods were not registered, the Tribunal found no evidence of mala fide intent for duty evasion and determined that the wire was not liable for confiscation. A reduced penalty of Rs. 10,000 was imposed on the manufacturing unit for technical violations, and the penalty on the Managing Director was set aside. The judgment underscored the significance of proper record-keeping and clear intentions in determining liabilities for duty evasion and penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 08:19:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193899" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 639 - CESTAT,  NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220535</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the manufacturing unit in a case involving the confiscation of goods and penalties for non-entry in the RG-I register. While the goods were not registered, the Tribunal found no evidence of mala fide intent for duty evasion and determined that the wire was not liable for confiscation. A reduced penalty of Rs. 10,000 was imposed on the manufacturing unit for technical violations, and the penalty on the Managing Director was set aside. The judgment underscored the significance of proper record-keeping and clear intentions in determining liabilities for duty evasion and penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220535</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>