<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 632 - CESTAT Ahmedabad</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220528</link>
    <description>The judgment upheld the respondent&#039;s eligibility to avail cenvat credit on service tax paid by the Custom House Agent for export services. The court rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing consistency in legal interpretation and application, citing a previous ruling in favor of the respondent on a similar issue. The decision confirmed that the CHA services qualified as input services under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, allowing the respondent to claim the credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 16:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193892" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 632 - CESTAT Ahmedabad</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220528</link>
      <description>The judgment upheld the respondent&#039;s eligibility to avail cenvat credit on service tax paid by the Custom House Agent for export services. The court rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing consistency in legal interpretation and application, citing a previous ruling in favor of the respondent on a similar issue. The decision confirmed that the CHA services qualified as input services under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, allowing the respondent to claim the credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220528</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>