<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 630 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220526</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(C)(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, dismissing the appellant&#039;s arguments challenging the penalty&#039;s justification and the alleged perversity of the impugned order. The Court found that the appellant&#039;s deliberate misrepresentation of losses and concealment of income details warranted the penalty imposition, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 06:24:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193890" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 630 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220526</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(C)(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, dismissing the appellant&#039;s arguments challenging the penalty&#039;s justification and the alleged perversity of the impugned order. The Court found that the appellant&#039;s deliberate misrepresentation of losses and concealment of income details warranted the penalty imposition, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220526</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>