<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 626 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220522</link>
    <description>The Court held in favor of the assessee, ruling that the entire scrap sales should be included in business profits for computation purposes under section 80 HHC. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to include only 7.5% of scrap sales in profits was overturned, emphasizing that no expenses are incurred for scrap generation, making all scrap sales eligible for inclusion in business profits. The Court rejected the revenue&#039;s argument that scrap value should only be included in total turnover, upholding the appellant&#039;s position based on established legal principles. The appeal was dismissed in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 14:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193886" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 626 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220522</link>
      <description>The Court held in favor of the assessee, ruling that the entire scrap sales should be included in business profits for computation purposes under section 80 HHC. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to include only 7.5% of scrap sales in profits was overturned, emphasizing that no expenses are incurred for scrap generation, making all scrap sales eligible for inclusion in business profits. The Court rejected the revenue&#039;s argument that scrap value should only be included in total turnover, upholding the appellant&#039;s position based on established legal principles. The appeal was dismissed in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220522</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>