https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220509 The appeal was accepted, and the impugned orders were overturned. The Tribunal found that the authorities erred in applying Rule 6 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, due to the lack of evidence supporting the use of cenvatable inputs in bagasse production. The duty demand, interest, and penalty were rejected based on a High Court ruling stating that bagasse from sugar manufacture is not a manufactured product. en-us Tue, 17 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 23 Jan 2013 10:21:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220509 The appeal was accepted, and the impugned orders were overturned. The Tribunal found that the authorities erred in applying Rule 6 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, due to the lack of evidence supporting the use of cenvatable inputs in bagasse production. The duty demand, interest, and penalty were rejected based on a High Court ruling stating that bagasse from sugar manufacture is not a manufactured product. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 17 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220509