https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220505 The Court concluded that the corrected Bill, reflecting a 15% duty rate on cranes, was legally binding despite procedural irregularities. The Petitioner's claim for a 12% duty rate was deemed invalid. The Petition was rejected, allowing the first Respondent to withdraw the deposited amount with interest. Additionally, the Respondents were ordered to pay costs for delayed document production. en-us Tue, 31 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 28 Jan 2013 16:23:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220505 The Court concluded that the corrected Bill, reflecting a 15% duty rate on cranes, was legally binding despite procedural irregularities. The Petitioner's claim for a 12% duty rate was deemed invalid. The Petition was rejected, allowing the first Respondent to withdraw the deposited amount with interest. Additionally, the Respondents were ordered to pay costs for delayed document production. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 31 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220505