<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 594 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220490</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee in a case concerning the levy of a penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for furnishing inaccurate particulars related to a claim under Section 80HHC of the Act. The Court found that the claim made by the assessee, although later deemed unsustainable, was considered bona fide and not intentionally misleading. As a result, the penalty was deemed unjustified, and the appeal by the revenue was dismissed, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2013 16:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193855" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 594 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220490</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee in a case concerning the levy of a penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for furnishing inaccurate particulars related to a claim under Section 80HHC of the Act. The Court found that the claim made by the assessee, although later deemed unsustainable, was considered bona fide and not intentionally misleading. As a result, the penalty was deemed unjustified, and the appeal by the revenue was dismissed, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220490</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>