<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 593 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220489</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s miscellaneous application, holding that net interest income should be considered for deduction under Section 80HHC of the Income Tax Act, 1961. This decision aligned with the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling, emphasizing the deduction of only net interest included in business profits. The Tribunal&#039;s validation of the assessee&#039;s position resulted in the dismissal of the revenue&#039;s appeals, establishing the significance of consistent interpretation and application of legal provisions in tax disputes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 07:38:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193854" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 593 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220489</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s miscellaneous application, holding that net interest income should be considered for deduction under Section 80HHC of the Income Tax Act, 1961. This decision aligned with the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling, emphasizing the deduction of only net interest included in business profits. The Tribunal&#039;s validation of the assessee&#039;s position resulted in the dismissal of the revenue&#039;s appeals, establishing the significance of consistent interpretation and application of legal provisions in tax disputes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220489</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>