https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220485 The Tribunal set aside the loading on imported goods after finding no influence on prices due to the relationship between the appellant and the foreign supplier. The differential duty was reduced to Rs. 6.42 crores, considering previous deposits, but the balance of duty and penalties was not waived. Specific deposit amounts were set for each party with a compliance deadline, emphasizing the importance of pre-deposit and warning of appeal dismissal for non-compliance. en-us Wed, 04 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 28 Jan 2013 07:37:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220485 The Tribunal set aside the loading on imported goods after finding no influence on prices due to the relationship between the appellant and the foreign supplier. The differential duty was reduced to Rs. 6.42 crores, considering previous deposits, but the balance of duty and penalties was not waived. Specific deposit amounts were set for each party with a compliance deadline, emphasizing the importance of pre-deposit and warning of appeal dismissal for non-compliance. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 04 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220485