https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220470 A letter disputing service tax liability on blending and bottling country liquor was construed as a whole and taken to show that the assessee had challenged the tax demand for the relevant period. The reference to payment under protest from July 2008 did not confine that expression only to later deposits; it was read as covering the earlier amount already paid for April 2008 to June 2008. On that basis, the entire deposit was treated as having been made under protest, and the refund claim was not hit by limitation. en-us Tue, 21 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 18 Mar 2013 11:19:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220470 A letter disputing service tax liability on blending and bottling country liquor was construed as a whole and taken to show that the assessee had challenged the tax demand for the relevant period. The reference to payment under protest from July 2008 did not confine that expression only to later deposits; it was read as covering the earlier amount already paid for April 2008 to June 2008. On that basis, the entire deposit was treated as having been made under protest, and the refund claim was not hit by limitation. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 21 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220470