<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 570 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220465</link>
    <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) decision to delete the addition of Rs. 13,50,000 as unexplained receipt from jewellery sale, finding that the Revenue failed to prove its case while the respondent provided sufficient evidence of the transaction&#039;s genuineness. The Tribunal concluded that the Commissioner&#039;s decision was justified, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The Court upheld the decision, noting the respondent&#039;s submission of substantial evidence, including confirmation of transactions and payment through a bank draft, supporting the genuineness of the jewellery sale.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 06:27:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193830" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 570 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220465</link>
      <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) decision to delete the addition of Rs. 13,50,000 as unexplained receipt from jewellery sale, finding that the Revenue failed to prove its case while the respondent provided sufficient evidence of the transaction&#039;s genuineness. The Tribunal concluded that the Commissioner&#039;s decision was justified, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The Court upheld the decision, noting the respondent&#039;s submission of substantial evidence, including confirmation of transactions and payment through a bank draft, supporting the genuineness of the jewellery sale.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220465</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>