<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 564 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220459</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed both appeals, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision that reassessment proceedings solely based on the District Valuation Officer&#039;s report were not valid. The judgment emphasized the necessity of corroborative evidence and the rejection of books of account before relying on external valuation reports for reassessment under the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 06:27:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193824" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 564 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220459</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed both appeals, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision that reassessment proceedings solely based on the District Valuation Officer&#039;s report were not valid. The judgment emphasized the necessity of corroborative evidence and the rejection of books of account before relying on external valuation reports for reassessment under the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220459</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>