<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 563 - CESTAT Ahmedabad</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220458</link>
    <description>The judges upheld the impugned order regarding the smuggling of sheep, liability for confiscation, and penalties, except for reducing the redemption fine and penalties for the appellants. The reduction was justified based on the appellants&#039; financial status and the circumstances of the case, leading to the redemption fine on the vessels being reduced to Rs. 50,000 each and the penalty on both appellants to Rs. 5,000 each.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 06:27:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193823" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 563 - CESTAT Ahmedabad</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220458</link>
      <description>The judges upheld the impugned order regarding the smuggling of sheep, liability for confiscation, and penalties, except for reducing the redemption fine and penalties for the appellants. The reduction was justified based on the appellants&#039; financial status and the circumstances of the case, leading to the redemption fine on the vessels being reduced to Rs. 50,000 each and the penalty on both appellants to Rs. 5,000 each.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220458</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>