<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 532 - COMPETITION APPELLATE TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220427</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming the findings of the Competition Commission of India (CCI). It upheld that the relevant market was correctly identified as international routes to and from India, not specific routes. There was no evidence of cartel formation among the airlines, as decisions were made independently. The airlines did not hold a dominant position in the relevant market, as no single airline or group possessed substantial market share. The investigation was deemed procedurally sound, and there was no adverse impact on competition or consumers, as the market remained competitive and consumers were not harmed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 07:21:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193793" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 532 - COMPETITION APPELLATE TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220427</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming the findings of the Competition Commission of India (CCI). It upheld that the relevant market was correctly identified as international routes to and from India, not specific routes. There was no evidence of cartel formation among the airlines, as decisions were made independently. The airlines did not hold a dominant position in the relevant market, as no single airline or group possessed substantial market share. The investigation was deemed procedurally sound, and there was no adverse impact on competition or consumers, as the market remained competitive and consumers were not harmed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Law of Competition</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220427</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>