<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 527 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220422</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the admissibility of Cenvat credit for the respondent based on evidence provided, despite the use of photocopies instead of original bills of entry. The decision highlighted the significance of proper documentation and legal precedents in determining credit admissibility, emphasizing the necessity of original documents for such claims.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 07:20:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193788" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 527 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220422</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the admissibility of Cenvat credit for the respondent based on evidence provided, despite the use of photocopies instead of original bills of entry. The decision highlighted the significance of proper documentation and legal precedents in determining credit admissibility, emphasizing the necessity of original documents for such claims.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220422</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>