<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 526 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220421</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi ruled in favor of the appellant, a petroleum products manufacturer, in a case involving the undervaluation of products for excise duty calculation due to temperature conversion. The Tribunal held that converting the actual volume at room temperature to notional volume at 15^0C for pricing did not constitute undervaluation to evade excise duty. As the goods were cleared on payment of excise duty as per declared price in invoices to unrelated parties, without evidence of additional considerations or related party transactions, the appellant was deemed to have correctly paid excise duty as per transaction value, as required by the Central Excise Act. The duty demands against the appellant were set aside, and the appeals were accepted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 07:20:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193787" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 526 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220421</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi ruled in favor of the appellant, a petroleum products manufacturer, in a case involving the undervaluation of products for excise duty calculation due to temperature conversion. The Tribunal held that converting the actual volume at room temperature to notional volume at 15^0C for pricing did not constitute undervaluation to evade excise duty. As the goods were cleared on payment of excise duty as per declared price in invoices to unrelated parties, without evidence of additional considerations or related party transactions, the appellant was deemed to have correctly paid excise duty as per transaction value, as required by the Central Excise Act. The duty demands against the appellant were set aside, and the appeals were accepted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220421</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>