<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 524 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220419</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to reject the petitioner&#039;s application for an extension of time to produce books of accounts. However, recognizing the assessing officer&#039;s failure to issue consequential orders, the Court allowed the petitioner to submit the books belatedly. The assessing officer was directed to act upon the submission, and the petitioner was instructed to provide necessary documents for compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 12:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193785" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 524 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220419</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to reject the petitioner&#039;s application for an extension of time to produce books of accounts. However, recognizing the assessing officer&#039;s failure to issue consequential orders, the Court allowed the petitioner to submit the books belatedly. The assessing officer was directed to act upon the submission, and the petitioner was instructed to provide necessary documents for compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220419</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>