<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 520 - CESTAT Ahmedabad</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220415</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case to the adjudicating authority for fresh consideration, emphasizing the importance of a letter verifying the appellant&#039;s claim of discharging service tax liability. The impugned order was set aside, and the matter was to be reevaluated based on the evidence presented, without expressing an opinion on the case&#039;s merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2015 11:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193781" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 520 - CESTAT Ahmedabad</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220415</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case to the adjudicating authority for fresh consideration, emphasizing the importance of a letter verifying the appellant&#039;s claim of discharging service tax liability. The impugned order was set aside, and the matter was to be reevaluated based on the evidence presented, without expressing an opinion on the case&#039;s merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220415</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>