<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 510 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220405</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, upholding the treatment of surrendered income as deemed income under sections 69, 69A, 69B, and 69C, thereby disallowing the set off of losses. However, it permitted the set off of unabsorbed depreciation outside the block of Assessment years 1997-98 to 2001-02, directing the Assessing Officer to reassess this issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 12:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193771" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 510 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220405</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, upholding the treatment of surrendered income as deemed income under sections 69, 69A, 69B, and 69C, thereby disallowing the set off of losses. However, it permitted the set off of unabsorbed depreciation outside the block of Assessment years 1997-98 to 2001-02, directing the Assessing Officer to reassess this issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220405</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>