<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 502 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220397</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision that penalties under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 did not apply to the respondents as they did not fall within the specified categories for penalty imposition. The judgment highlighted the necessity of adhering to the specific criteria outlined in the law for penalizing individuals or entities under Rule 25.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 10:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193763" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 502 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220397</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision that penalties under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 did not apply to the respondents as they did not fall within the specified categories for penalty imposition. The judgment highlighted the necessity of adhering to the specific criteria outlined in the law for penalizing individuals or entities under Rule 25.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220397</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>