<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 495 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220390</link>
    <description>The HC held that surrendered sums assessed under ss.69/69A/69B/69C are deemed income distinct from income under s.14 heads (salary, house property, business/profession, capital gains or other sources) because their source is unexplained; accordingly such deemed income cannot attract deductions or set-offs available under ss.70 and 71 against business losses. The court sustained taxation of surrendered income as deemed income without allowing inter-head or intra-head set-off, ruling against the taxpayer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2025 13:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193756" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 495 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220390</link>
      <description>The HC held that surrendered sums assessed under ss.69/69A/69B/69C are deemed income distinct from income under s.14 heads (salary, house property, business/profession, capital gains or other sources) because their source is unexplained; accordingly such deemed income cannot attract deductions or set-offs available under ss.70 and 71 against business losses. The court sustained taxation of surrendered income as deemed income without allowing inter-head or intra-head set-off, ruling against the taxpayer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220390</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>