<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 483 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220378</link>
    <description>The appeals were dismissed, affirming the decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The court held that the proviso to Section 64(1)(ii) was correctly applied, and the assessee failed to conclusively prove that his wife&#039;s income was solely attributable to her technical or professional knowledge and experience. Pending applications were also disposed of, with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 07:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193744" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 483 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220378</link>
      <description>The appeals were dismissed, affirming the decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The court held that the proviso to Section 64(1)(ii) was correctly applied, and the assessee failed to conclusively prove that his wife&#039;s income was solely attributable to her technical or professional knowledge and experience. Pending applications were also disposed of, with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220378</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>