<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 479 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220374</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) decisions on the deletion of the addition made on account of alleged investment in construction of house and the acceptance of additional evidence under Rule 46A(3). However, the Tribunal directed the issue of the deletion of the addition made on account of capital gain to be sent back to the Assessing Officer for re-examination and de novo adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2013 15:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193740" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 479 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220374</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) decisions on the deletion of the addition made on account of alleged investment in construction of house and the acceptance of additional evidence under Rule 46A(3). However, the Tribunal directed the issue of the deletion of the addition made on account of capital gain to be sent back to the Assessing Officer for re-examination and de novo adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220374</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>