https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220367 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT New Delhi ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the impugned orders regarding the interpretation of Rule 6(3)(b) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 on payment for bagasse and press mud in sugar manufacturing. The tribunal held that the payment was not required as per precedents established in previous judgments, including those by the Hon'ble Allahabad High Court and other tribunal cases. This decision clarified that the payment under Rule 6(3)(b) was not applicable in situations involving bagasse and press mud, providing alignment with established legal interpretations. en-us Fri, 11 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 18 Jan 2013 18:05:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220367 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT New Delhi ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the impugned orders regarding the interpretation of Rule 6(3)(b) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 on payment for bagasse and press mud in sugar manufacturing. The tribunal held that the payment was not required as per precedents established in previous judgments, including those by the Hon'ble Allahabad High Court and other tribunal cases. This decision clarified that the payment under Rule 6(3)(b) was not applicable in situations involving bagasse and press mud, providing alignment with established legal interpretations. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 11 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220367