https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220361 The Tribunal did not entertain the objection based on the National Litigation Policy raised by the respondents' counsel due to its untimeliness. Referring to relevant Supreme Court judgments, the Tribunal held in favor of the appellant regarding the liability of respondents to pay interest on differential duty under Section 11AB. The issue of time bar on demands for interest on differential duty was addressed, with certain appeals allowed within the normal limitation period and others remanded for a fresh decision on the limitation issue. Overall, the appeals were allowed, emphasizing the importance of a fair hearing for the respondents. en-us Fri, 30 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 10 Dec 2015 10:53:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220361 The Tribunal did not entertain the objection based on the National Litigation Policy raised by the respondents' counsel due to its untimeliness. Referring to relevant Supreme Court judgments, the Tribunal held in favor of the appellant regarding the liability of respondents to pay interest on differential duty under Section 11AB. The issue of time bar on demands for interest on differential duty was addressed, with certain appeals allowed within the normal limitation period and others remanded for a fresh decision on the limitation issue. Overall, the appeals were allowed, emphasizing the importance of a fair hearing for the respondents. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 30 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220361