<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 458 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220353</link>
    <description>The court allowed the appeal, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision and remitting the case for further adjudication on the issue of penalty imposition under Section 271(1)(c) and 273(2)(a) in accordance with the law. The judgment clarified the interpretation of Section 271(1B) and highlighted the significance of assessing the satisfaction recorded by the Assessing Officer for penalty initiation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2013 07:44:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193719" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 458 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220353</link>
      <description>The court allowed the appeal, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision and remitting the case for further adjudication on the issue of penalty imposition under Section 271(1)(c) and 273(2)(a) in accordance with the law. The judgment clarified the interpretation of Section 271(1B) and highlighted the significance of assessing the satisfaction recorded by the Assessing Officer for penalty initiation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220353</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>