<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 445 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220340</link>
    <description>The court clarified that under the Companies Act, 1956, secured creditors in liquidation proceedings are treated equally without distinction based on their charge priority. The judgment emphasized the uniform treatment of secured creditors in calculating the distribution ratio, upholding the principle of pari passu charge in asset distribution. The court dismissed the appeals, stating that the submissions lacked substance and did not align with legal provisions governing the distribution of assets in liquidation proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2013 07:42:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193706" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 445 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220340</link>
      <description>The court clarified that under the Companies Act, 1956, secured creditors in liquidation proceedings are treated equally without distinction based on their charge priority. The judgment emphasized the uniform treatment of secured creditors in calculating the distribution ratio, upholding the principle of pari passu charge in asset distribution. The court dismissed the appeals, stating that the submissions lacked substance and did not align with legal provisions governing the distribution of assets in liquidation proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220340</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>