<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 418 - CESTAT Ahmedabad</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220313</link>
    <description>CBEC Circular No. 390/Misc/163/2010-JC dated 20.10.2010 directs that appeals should not be filed where duty or penalty is below the prescribed threshold of one lakh rupees. Applying that administrative instruction, the Tribunal dismissed Revenue&#039;s appeal against a penalty of 50,000 rupees after noting that the first appellate authority had already set aside the penalty. The Tribunal expressly left the substantive question of law undecided, to be examined in an appropriate case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2013 19:12:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193679" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 418 - CESTAT Ahmedabad</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220313</link>
      <description>CBEC Circular No. 390/Misc/163/2010-JC dated 20.10.2010 directs that appeals should not be filed where duty or penalty is below the prescribed threshold of one lakh rupees. Applying that administrative instruction, the Tribunal dismissed Revenue&#039;s appeal against a penalty of 50,000 rupees after noting that the first appellate authority had already set aside the penalty. The Tribunal expressly left the substantive question of law undecided, to be examined in an appropriate case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220313</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>