<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 406 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220301</link>
    <description>A contract for cutting and supplying sugar cane with other labourers was found not to show any direct or indirect provision of recruitment or supply of manpower to the sugar factory, so the service tax demand under manpower recruitment and supply agency service was not supported on the available record. As a result, the applicant made out a case for waiver of pre-deposit, and recovery of the disputed dues was stayed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2014 15:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193667" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 406 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220301</link>
      <description>A contract for cutting and supplying sugar cane with other labourers was found not to show any direct or indirect provision of recruitment or supply of manpower to the sugar factory, so the service tax demand under manpower recruitment and supply agency service was not supported on the available record. As a result, the applicant made out a case for waiver of pre-deposit, and recovery of the disputed dues was stayed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220301</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>