<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 404 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220299</link>
    <description>In a service tax dispute concerning Goods Transport Agency service, the appellant sought waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery while claiming the benefit of Notification No. 34/2004-ST. A prima facie case for waiver was found because the same assessee had obtained a favourable view for a subsequent period, whereas the impugned order had taken the opposite view on an identical issue. Support was also drawn from a coordinate Bench ruling granting unconditional stay where the gross amount charged by the service provider was Rs. 1,500 or less. On that basis, pre-deposit was waived and recovery stayed until disposal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 09:16:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193665" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 404 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220299</link>
      <description>In a service tax dispute concerning Goods Transport Agency service, the appellant sought waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery while claiming the benefit of Notification No. 34/2004-ST. A prima facie case for waiver was found because the same assessee had obtained a favourable view for a subsequent period, whereas the impugned order had taken the opposite view on an identical issue. Support was also drawn from a coordinate Bench ruling granting unconditional stay where the gross amount charged by the service provider was Rs. 1,500 or less. On that basis, pre-deposit was waived and recovery stayed until disposal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220299</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>