<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 395 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220290</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes. The tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to reconsider the issue of notional interest and to allow deduction under Section 10A before setting off unabsorbed losses. The tribunal upheld the bifurcation of interest income, permitting deduction for interest on fixed deposits but not for interest on NSC and loans to employees.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 12:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193656" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 395 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220290</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes. The tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to reconsider the issue of notional interest and to allow deduction under Section 10A before setting off unabsorbed losses. The tribunal upheld the bifurcation of interest income, permitting deduction for interest on fixed deposits but not for interest on NSC and loans to employees.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220290</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>