<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 389 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220284</link>
    <description>Storage charges for containers were held recoverable under the TAMP tariff order dated 15.05.2009, which governed the dispute. Clause 3.12.11 allowed levy on abandoned FCL or shipper-owned containers until the earlier of written intimation of abandonment or 75 days from landing, and provided that charges would continue if the shipping line did not take the required steps within time. Because the abandonment letters were issued after the 75-day period and the demands matched the notified tariff, the challenge to recovery failed. Reliance on earlier TAMP orders and on provisions relating to sale or disposal of goods by the Port Trust did not displace the applicable tariff regime.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 09:14:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193650" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 389 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220284</link>
      <description>Storage charges for containers were held recoverable under the TAMP tariff order dated 15.05.2009, which governed the dispute. Clause 3.12.11 allowed levy on abandoned FCL or shipper-owned containers until the earlier of written intimation of abandonment or 75 days from landing, and provided that charges would continue if the shipping line did not take the required steps within time. Because the abandonment letters were issued after the 75-day period and the demands matched the notified tariff, the challenge to recovery failed. Reliance on earlier TAMP orders and on provisions relating to sale or disposal of goods by the Port Trust did not displace the applicable tariff regime.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220284</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>