https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220279 The High Court dismissed the appeal as the Tribunal had already ruled in favor of the assessee, acknowledging the genuine mistake in submitting the declaration under the wrong notification. Despite the error in mentioning the notification number, the Tribunal upheld that the assessee was entitled to benefits under the correct notification, as the goods manufactured were covered under Notification No. 50. The High Court found no legal or factual issues to reconsider, affirming the Tribunal's decision in favor of the assessee. en-us Tue, 25 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 18 Jan 2013 09:11:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220279 The High Court dismissed the appeal as the Tribunal had already ruled in favor of the assessee, acknowledging the genuine mistake in submitting the declaration under the wrong notification. Despite the error in mentioning the notification number, the Tribunal upheld that the assessee was entitled to benefits under the correct notification, as the goods manufactured were covered under Notification No. 50. The High Court found no legal or factual issues to reconsider, affirming the Tribunal's decision in favor of the assessee. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 25 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220279