<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 370 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220264</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, setting aside the CIT-III&#039;s orders on both issues. The Tribunal emphasized that it had not expressed any view on the nature of expenses or the allowance of depreciation, leaving the decisions to the lower authorities. It highlighted the importance of proper inquiry and avoiding changes of opinion in such matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 15:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193631" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 370 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220264</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, setting aside the CIT-III&#039;s orders on both issues. The Tribunal emphasized that it had not expressed any view on the nature of expenses or the allowance of depreciation, leaving the decisions to the lower authorities. It highlighted the importance of proper inquiry and avoiding changes of opinion in such matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220264</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>