<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 353 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220247</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the Circular&#039;s requirements were not mandatory and could not be used to deny substantive rights. The Commissioner&#039;s order was deemed fair and just as the service tax had been paid, preventing the Revenue from challenging the decision. Additionally, in a similar case, the Tribunal dismissed an appeal based on substantial compliance with the procedure outlined in a specific Notification, with no substantial questions of law raised.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2014 10:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193614" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 353 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220247</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the Circular&#039;s requirements were not mandatory and could not be used to deny substantive rights. The Commissioner&#039;s order was deemed fair and just as the service tax had been paid, preventing the Revenue from challenging the decision. Additionally, in a similar case, the Tribunal dismissed an appeal based on substantial compliance with the procedure outlined in a specific Notification, with no substantial questions of law raised.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220247</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>