https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220243 The High Court admitted the appellant's appeal on the substantial question of law and allowed it to proceed without requiring the initial deposit of Rs.85,00,000, based on the inconsistency in the Revenue's stance regarding the classification of services provided by the appellant. The court quashed the CESTAT's pre-deposit order and directed the tribunal to hear the appeal on merits without any pre-deposit requirement, providing relief to the appellant and clarifying the tax liability classification issue. en-us Tue, 14 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 15 May 2013 14:02:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220243 The High Court admitted the appellant's appeal on the substantial question of law and allowed it to proceed without requiring the initial deposit of Rs.85,00,000, based on the inconsistency in the Revenue's stance regarding the classification of services provided by the appellant. The court quashed the CESTAT's pre-deposit order and directed the tribunal to hear the appeal on merits without any pre-deposit requirement, providing relief to the appellant and clarifying the tax liability classification issue. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 14 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220243