<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 345 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220239</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that payment of Advance Tax or Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) does not constitute disclosure of income. The Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, stating that the Assessing Officer was justified in assuming that the assessee did not disclose its total income due to the failure to file the return on time. The Court emphasized that Advance Tax is an estimate and does not absolve the obligation to file a return disclosing total income. The appeals were allowed, and costs were awarded to the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2015 10:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193606" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 345 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220239</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that payment of Advance Tax or Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) does not constitute disclosure of income. The Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, stating that the Assessing Officer was justified in assuming that the assessee did not disclose its total income due to the failure to file the return on time. The Court emphasized that Advance Tax is an estimate and does not absolve the obligation to file a return disclosing total income. The appeals were allowed, and costs were awarded to the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220239</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>