https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220228 The appeal was disposed of with the direction for the lower authority to examine the applicability of unjust enrichment with relevant case law, as per the decisions of the Commissioner and the Tribunal. The matter was remanded for supplying documents related to unjust enrichment, and the appellant was instructed to provide necessary documents for a decision on the merits of the case and unjust enrichment. The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner's decision to remand the matter for further adjudication in light of circulars clarifying the issue of revised interest on warehoused goods. en-us Fri, 04 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 16 Jan 2013 06:41:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220228 The appeal was disposed of with the direction for the lower authority to examine the applicability of unjust enrichment with relevant case law, as per the decisions of the Commissioner and the Tribunal. The matter was remanded for supplying documents related to unjust enrichment, and the appellant was instructed to provide necessary documents for a decision on the merits of the case and unjust enrichment. The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner's decision to remand the matter for further adjudication in light of circulars clarifying the issue of revised interest on warehoused goods. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 04 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220228