https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220225 The court quashed the show cause notices and the adjudication order, holding that the petitioner did not manufacture blank CDs/DVDs and was not liable for Central Excise duty. The court exercised its jurisdiction under Article 226, deeming the alternative remedy not equally efficacious. The writ petitions were allowed, and parties were directed to bear their own costs. en-us Fri, 11 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 May 2013 13:11:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220225 The court quashed the show cause notices and the adjudication order, holding that the petitioner did not manufacture blank CDs/DVDs and was not liable for Central Excise duty. The court exercised its jurisdiction under Article 226, deeming the alternative remedy not equally efficacious. The writ petitions were allowed, and parties were directed to bear their own costs. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 11 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220225