<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 297 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220191</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994, against the appellant for failing to pay service tax on time. The consideration received was treated as cum tax, reducing the tax liability. The Commissioner&#039;s order setting aside penalties under Sections 77 &amp;amp; 78 was not revisited, but the penalty under Section 76 was upheld as there was no intention to evade service tax. The appellant&#039;s appeal was disposed of, affirming the imposition of the penalty under Section 76 within prescribed limits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2014 11:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193560" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 297 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220191</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994, against the appellant for failing to pay service tax on time. The consideration received was treated as cum tax, reducing the tax liability. The Commissioner&#039;s order setting aside penalties under Sections 77 &amp;amp; 78 was not revisited, but the penalty under Section 76 was upheld as there was no intention to evade service tax. The appellant&#039;s appeal was disposed of, affirming the imposition of the penalty under Section 76 within prescribed limits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220191</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>