<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 290 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220184</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to grant exemption under section 54F of the Income Tax Act. It ruled that utilizing the sale proceeds before the extended due date under section 139(4) was sufficient for claiming exemption, even if not within the initial due date under section 139(1). The Tribunal relied on legal precedents and interpretations to support this decision, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 13:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193553" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 290 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220184</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to grant exemption under section 54F of the Income Tax Act. It ruled that utilizing the sale proceeds before the extended due date under section 139(4) was sufficient for claiming exemption, even if not within the initial due date under section 139(1). The Tribunal relied on legal precedents and interpretations to support this decision, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220184</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>