<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 285 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220179</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed both appeals by the Revenue despite finding that the assessee&#039;s claim for immunity under Explanation 5 to Section 271(1)(c) was not maintainable due to various reasons outlined in the case. The decision was based on the Departmental Representative&#039;s concession that the conditions of Explanation 5 were met, rather than the merits of the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2013 19:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193548" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 285 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220179</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed both appeals by the Revenue despite finding that the assessee&#039;s claim for immunity under Explanation 5 to Section 271(1)(c) was not maintainable due to various reasons outlined in the case. The decision was based on the Departmental Representative&#039;s concession that the conditions of Explanation 5 were met, rather than the merits of the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220179</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>