<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 284 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220178</link>
    <description>The tribunal concluded that losses from transactions on the Multi Commodity Exchange should be treated as business losses, not speculative losses, under section 43(5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to allow the assessee&#039;s claim for assessment years 2008-09 and 2009-10. Additionally, regarding an unexplained investment in gold and silver for the year 2009-10, the tribunal partially allowed the claim, sustaining an addition of Rs. 2.5 lakhs and deleting the remaining addition due to customary practices in Hindu families.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2013 16:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193547" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 284 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220178</link>
      <description>The tribunal concluded that losses from transactions on the Multi Commodity Exchange should be treated as business losses, not speculative losses, under section 43(5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to allow the assessee&#039;s claim for assessment years 2008-09 and 2009-10. Additionally, regarding an unexplained investment in gold and silver for the year 2009-10, the tribunal partially allowed the claim, sustaining an addition of Rs. 2.5 lakhs and deleting the remaining addition due to customary practices in Hindu families.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220178</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>