<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 273 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220167</link>
    <description>Security under the KVAT Act may be demanded only within the statutory ceiling of one-half of the tax payable on the estimated turnover, and additional security is permissible only if the earlier estimate is shown to be inadequate. The CST Act contains a similar framework, with the aggregate security demand controlled by the statutory ceiling in Section 7(3BB). The High Court found that the notice and cancellation order did not demonstrate proper application of these limits or the required statutory conditions before demanding additional security and cancelling registration. The demand and cancellation were therefore held invalid and set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2014 11:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193536" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 273 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220167</link>
      <description>Security under the KVAT Act may be demanded only within the statutory ceiling of one-half of the tax payable on the estimated turnover, and additional security is permissible only if the earlier estimate is shown to be inadequate. The CST Act contains a similar framework, with the aggregate security demand controlled by the statutory ceiling in Section 7(3BB). The High Court found that the notice and cancellation order did not demonstrate proper application of these limits or the required statutory conditions before demanding additional security and cancelling registration. The demand and cancellation were therefore held invalid and set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220167</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>