<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 270 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220164</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal set aside the penalty imposed under section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994, as the appellant deposited the Service Tax within the required timeline after receiving consideration for services. The tribunal&#039;s decision emphasized adherence to statutory timelines for tax payment, ultimately providing relief to the appellant and disposing of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2014 15:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193533" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 270 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220164</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal set aside the penalty imposed under section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994, as the appellant deposited the Service Tax within the required timeline after receiving consideration for services. The tribunal&#039;s decision emphasized adherence to statutory timelines for tax payment, ultimately providing relief to the appellant and disposing of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220164</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>