<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 263 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220157</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision confirming the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The penalty was imposed due to the assessee&#039;s failure to explain seized documents, resulting in inaccurate particulars of income and concealed income. Despite the assessee offering the undisclosed income for taxation later, the penalty was upheld as the income was only surrendered after being confronted with evidence and no revised return was filed initially. The Tribunal emphasized that voluntary surrender of income post-detection does not absolve from penalties, leading to dismissal of the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2013 12:06:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193526" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 263 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220157</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision confirming the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The penalty was imposed due to the assessee&#039;s failure to explain seized documents, resulting in inaccurate particulars of income and concealed income. Despite the assessee offering the undisclosed income for taxation later, the penalty was upheld as the income was only surrendered after being confronted with evidence and no revised return was filed initially. The Tribunal emphasized that voluntary surrender of income post-detection does not absolve from penalties, leading to dismissal of the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220157</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>